You've excluded the answer I would have gone with ("depends on your data").
Only one in five knows what mlr is! I am surprised!
Machine Learning in R? Medical Loss Ratio? Major League Rugby?(I did eventually figure out you meant multiple linear regression)
Yes, multiple linear regression.
Ah. Too many possible acronyms
I suppose, from a theortical standpoint, to do time series analysis?Both are crap. I know that. I feel like multiple linear is less crap, but I haven't yet proven that to myself.
MLR will definitely help you convince yourself that you’re seeing real trends, rather than just overfitting your data.
Tony Lower-Basch .... That is just overfitting by another name, right?
William Nichols: Yeah, but a tool that lets you fool yourself about that is ... better? Probably? Maybe?
Sounds worse, Tony
You've excluded the answer I would have gone with ("depends on your data").
ReplyDeleteOnly one in five knows what mlr is! I am surprised!
ReplyDeleteMachine Learning in R? Medical Loss Ratio? Major League Rugby?
ReplyDelete(I did eventually figure out you meant multiple linear regression)
Yes, multiple linear regression.
ReplyDeleteAh. Too many possible acronyms
ReplyDeleteI suppose, from a theortical standpoint, to do time series analysis?
ReplyDeleteBoth are crap. I know that. I feel like multiple linear is less crap, but I haven't yet proven that to myself.
MLR will definitely help you convince yourself that you’re seeing real trends, rather than just overfitting your data.
ReplyDeleteTony Lower-Basch .... That is just overfitting by another name, right?
ReplyDeleteWilliam Nichols: Yeah, but a tool that lets you fool yourself about that is ... better? Probably? Maybe?
ReplyDeleteSounds worse, Tony
ReplyDelete