Awesome does not equal popular.
I miss wave. ;_;
Google needs to start doing a better job of marketing and advertising products they don't really care about.
David Rothfeder I think they did care about plus, at least. And reader had a fairly prominent position for a while.
Eva Schiffer Wave was delightful, if not incredibly useful.
Wave was amazing for collaborating on writing and editing.
After g+ got going they didn’t really do anything though. They never responded to the years of claims that nobody was on g+.
Eva Schiffer Good for drafting, sure. I never did figure out a good way to go from Wave to a consumable format.
William Nichols I was co-writing a cookbook at the time it was released, so separated by one recipe per wave worked really well. Sadly I didn't get to the step of actually laying out the cookbook.
Awesome does not equal popular.
ReplyDeleteI miss wave. ;_;
ReplyDeleteGoogle needs to start doing a better job of marketing and advertising products they don't really care about.
ReplyDeleteDavid Rothfeder I think they did care about plus, at least. And reader had a fairly prominent position for a while.
ReplyDeleteEva Schiffer Wave was delightful, if not incredibly useful.
ReplyDeleteWave was amazing for collaborating on writing and editing.
ReplyDeleteAfter g+ got going they didn’t really do anything though. They never responded to the years of claims that nobody was on g+.
ReplyDeleteEva Schiffer Good for drafting, sure. I never did figure out a good way to go from Wave to a consumable format.
ReplyDeleteWilliam Nichols I was co-writing a cookbook at the time it was released, so separated by one recipe per wave worked really well. Sadly I didn't get to the step of actually laying out the cookbook.
ReplyDelete